Don't miss out
Every morning, the Energy News Network compiles the top stories about the clean energy transition and delivers them to your inbox for free. Sign up today!
An excellent story from Greenwire today on the controversy over new EPA greenhouse gas regulations briefly contained a common misconception about a proposed oil refinery in South Dakota.
First, a bit of background. The refinery, which Hyperion plans to build near Elk
River Point, South Dakota (just across the state line from Sioux City, Iowa), would be the first new refinery built in the United States since 1976. It would essentially double the refining capacity of Minnesota, Wisconsin and the Dakotas combined, and would also double South Dakota’s carbon emissions footprint.
Two pipelines are involved: Keystone 1, built by TransCanada, is currently operating in eastern South Dakota, not terribly far from the Hyperion site. Keystone XL, which would also be built by TransCanada, is in the planning stages and has yet to be approved by the State Department.
The story (which was quickly and courteously corrected by reporter Gabriel Nelson) said that the controversial Hyperion refinery would be supplied by the equally controversial Keystone XL pipeline.
The confusion is understandable – Midwest Energy News made the same mistake in October when quoting from a story in the Iowa Independent. Earlier media coverage has discussed the Keystone 1 pipeline as a possible supplier.
Thankfully, Paul Blackburn from Plains Justice was able to clear things up. Here’s what he shared at the time:
So in order for Hyperion to function, it would need to either build a link to the Keystone XL pipeline or find some other way to ship crude oil from Canada.
Photo by Shannon Patrick via Creative Commons