Stay connected!

Our FREE newsletters provide a daily roundup of the morning’s top headlines. Subscribe today!






Our FREE newsletters provide a daily roundup of the morning’s top headlines. Subscribe today!






There’s still a lot of gol-durn wind turbines in Texas.

Linda Taylor, a colleague at Fresh Energy, makes a good point in her comment on yesterday’s post about wind capacity rankings. Ranking states on installed capacity alone doesn’t make sense, she argues, because you’re comparing big states (in terms of both area and population) like California and Texas to smaller states, like Iowa.

So I whipped up a spreadsheet that includes the leading wind producing states, using AWEA’s numbers, and then added their populations (according to April 2010 Census figures) and their total electricity generation (according to Energy Information Administration stats).

A caveat – yes, I realize that we’re using megawatts of wind capacity and megawatt-hours of electricity generation, and that those are two different units. The EIA doesn’t break out wind generation as a separate stat, and since we’re doing relative comparisons from state-to-state, it shouldn’t make a difference.

According to AWEA, the top states for wind power generation are as follows:

1. Texas
2. Iowa
3. California
4. Minnesota
5. Washington
6. Oregon
7. Illinois
8. Oklahoma
9. North Dakota
10. Wyoming

But when you factor in population (wind capacity per capita), here’s how it shakes out:

1. Wyoming
2. North Dakota
3. Iowa
4. South Dakota
5. Oregon
6. Minnesota
7. Texas
8. Oklahoma
9. Kansas
10. Washington

And if you rank the states by wind power as a percentage of total power generated, here’s what you get:

1. Iowa
2. South Dakota
3. Minnesota
4. North Dakota
5. Oregon
6. Wyoming
7. Colorado
8. Texas
9. Kansas
10. Oklahoma

California, the #2 wind producer overall, doesn’t show up on either of the lists. Illinois also drops out of both rankings, as it has both a large population and is a net exporter of electricity.

It’s also worth noting that the percentages I’m dealing with here are small – in the case of per capita wind capacity, they’re carried out to four or five decimal places. Meaning that wind power is still a very small part of the picture.

Photo by Danish Wind Industry Association via Creative Commons

Ken Paulman

Ken is the director of the Energy News Network at Fresh Energy and is a founding editor of both Midwest Energy News and Southeast Energy News. Prior to joining Fresh Energy, he was the managing editor for online news at Minnesota Public Radio. He started his journalism career in 2002 as a copy editor for the Duluth News Tribune before spending five years at the Spokesman-Review in Spokane, Washington, where he worked as a copy editor, online producer, features editor and night city editor. A Nebraska native, Ken has a bachelor's degree from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a master's degree from the University of Oregon. He is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists and Investigative Reporters and Editors.

6 replies on “Rethinking wind rankings”