• Energy News Network
  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • Opinion
  • Newsletters
    • Daily email digests
    • Centered.tech
  • Books
  • About
    • Code of Ethics
    • Staff
  • Donate
climate change

Commentary: Are conservatives turning a corner on climate?

Written By Bob InglisFebruary 19, 2015
Bob inglis is a former U.S. Representative from South Carolina.

Bob Inglis is a former U.S. Representative from South Carolina.

There’s still a long way to go, but conservatives may have begun to move on climate change.

Fifteen Republican U.S. Senators voted on January 21st for a Republican-offered amendment that said “human activity contributes to climate change.” Five Republican U.S. Senators were willing to go further that day, voting for an amendment that says “human activity significantly contributes to climate change.” Illinois Sen. Mark Kirk was a leader among the fifteen and the five.

Perhaps it’s the dawn of the 2016 presidential cycle and the facing of an expanded electorate. Perhaps it’s the 2016 Senate reelection map that’s home to large swaths of that expanded electorate, some of it in places like Chicago. Or maybe it’s that we’re beginning to see the back of the Great Recession, and the great and immediate fears of that dark time are receding.

Whatever it is, conservatives seem to be taking the first steps in a journey of restored faith. In the depths of the Great Recession, disbelief in climate change became orthodoxy. Climate change was a hoax. Politicians on the right learned to deliver the comforting lines that climate change was one thing we needn’t worry about.

As the Great Recession began receding, a number of conservatives started saying, “I’m not a scientist.” It was a subtle but important move away from doctrinaire denial and toward a middle, agnostic position.

If these are the first steps in a journey of restored faith, three things will have to happen.

First, conservatives will need to come to the realization that the “I’m-not-a-scientist” line is untenable as evidenced by President Obama’s successful mocking of it in his State of the Union address. If a representative isn’t a doctor, truck driver or trade lawyer, must he or she also demur on healthcare, road funding or trade agreements? Our constitutional republic requires sterner stuff. Representatives are expected to listen, learn and lead. Lack of formal subject matter expertise doesn’t give a representative a bye on important questions.

Second, conservatives will want to attach themselves to a solution better than cap and trade. Cap and trade would have grown the government, hurt American competitiveness and created an unnecessarily complicated trading scheme. Better to talk about a simple, revenue-neutral, border-adjustable carbon tax. That tax could be made revenue-neutral by pairing the tax–dollar-for-dollar–with a cut in existing taxes. The border adjustment of removing the tax on exports and imposing the tax on imports would level the playing field with trade competitors. Once upheld by the World Trade Organization, the border adjustment would make it in the interest of other nations to join us in pricing carbon dioxide in their own economies.

Third, conservative leaders will have to move to actual faith. They’ll need to believe in the power of free enterprise. They’ll need to believe that we could eliminate all subsidies for all fuels and attach all costs to all fuels. They’ll need to believe that citizens, in the liberty of enlightened self-interest, can drive innovation once marketplaces are made transparent and fossil fuels are held accountable for socializing soot.

If they can complete that journey of faith, conservatives will enter the competition of ideas with an alternative to command and control regulation. If we fail to enter the competition and if the country decides to act on climate, we risk losing a tremendous opportunity for free enterprise.

Bob Inglis directs the Energy and Enterprise Initiative based at George Mason University. Inglis, a Republican, represented South Carolina’s Fourth District in the U.S. Congress from 1993-1999 and from 2005-2011.

Related News

  • As policing and pandemic dominate election, climate pushed to back burner

    Minnesota candidates haven’t pressed climate or clean energy despite rising temperatures and voter interest.

  • Survey: Virginians seeking out news about climate change and solutions

    A George Mason University researcher found a strong interest in reporting on how climate change is affecting local communities — and stories that spotlight solutions.

  • Can an evangelical group change Ohio lawmakers’ minds on clean energy?

    A petition signed by 53,000 Ohioans pressures anti-abortion lawmakers to also oppose pollution from fossil fuels.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You can change which regions you're subscribed to by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

Latest News

  • Power plant smokestacks in the background; power lines in the foreground.
    As coal plants close, advocates want relief for Wisconsin ratepayers
  • Closeup of the HourCar logo on the back of a blue car.
    Minnesota car-share program seeks to boost EV access in diverse neighborhoods
  • Inside the Ohio Senate chamber from above.
    Ohio Republicans’ bill would force state agencies to reduce their rule books
  • An aerial view of downtown Lima, Ohio.
    Ohio refinery city joins coalition to support local clean energy transitions
  • A sign: "Town of Kennebunkport, Incorporated 1653."
    Bonus rebate aims to entice Maine small towns to make the switch to heat pumps
  • Lake Superior reflects lighted skyline along the Duluth, Minnesota, lakefront.
    Duluth looks to cut emissions through sharing more efficient building heat
  • Lawrence Brothers laser
    This Virginia coal-mining equipment supplier sees a future in clean energy
  • Indiana Capitol Building
    Indiana lawmakers advance coal plant securitization, renewable siting bills

More from the Energy News Network

  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • About
  • Support

The Energy News Network is an editorially independent project of  
© Copyright 2021

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑