• Energy News Network
  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • Opinion
  • Newsletters
    • Daily email digests
    • Centered.tech
  • Books
  • About
    • Code of Ethics
    • Staff
  • Donate
Illinois

Opponents of Illinois coal mine not backing down

Written By Dan RafterJuly 1, 2015
Photo By
Jason Lindsey

Jason Lindsey

The Salt Fork of the Vermilion River, near the proposed Bulldog Mine.

After more than five years, a proposed coal mine in central Illinois remains in a holding pattern, but landowners opposed to the project have not let their guard down.

Sunrise Coal is still working to acquire the two permits it needs to operate its proposed underground Bulldog Mine, a 23,000-acre project in Vermilion County. A handful of landowner and environmental groups — led by Stand up To Coal and Prairie Rivers Network – are actively opposing the project.

But nothing can happen until Sunrise Coal answers 62 questions from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

The department asked these questions on March 20 as a result of the original permit application for mining and reclamation planning that Sunrise Coal submitted. Sunrise has until March 20 of next year to answer the questions. Then, officials with the DNR will either ask for more clarification or grant or reject Sunrise’s permit application.

Meanwhile, the farmers and activists opposed to the mine vow to continue their efforts to keep it from opening.

“We are still actively watching this proposal,” said Tyler Rotche, Prairie Rivers Network water policy specialist. “We are supporting Stand up to Coal and the farmers and landowners who are opposed to this mine. We are keeping track of the process and noting some of the insufficiencies in the materials that Sunrise is submitting.”

Sunrise also needs a permit from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to allow it to discharge water from the proposed mine. The IEPA released a draft permit on March 27. A public hearing is scheduled for August 12 in Sidell, Ill.

Rotche said members of the Prairie Rivers Network and other mine opponents will attend in force.

Despite the opposition, Sunrise Coal still plans to begin construction on the Bulldog Mine in late 2015 or in 2016.

“As has been reported, we are in the process of acquiring our permits,” said Suzanne Jaworowski, director of communications and government affairs for the Terre Haute, Indiana-based company. “I don’t have an update or a timeline for you.”

The history

Debate over the Bulldog Mine goes back to 2009, when leasing agents from Sunrise Coal began soliciting mineral leases from residents. In 2010 residents opposed to the plan formed Stand Up to Coal, a grassroots association of landowners, farmers and other locals.

Members of Stand Up to Coal voiced several concerns during public hearings on the Bulldog Mine. Some worried that coal mining would damage their land and pollute their water supplies. Others wondered how Sunrise would transport the coal from its mine and how many waste pits would operate onsite.

“This mine will take more than 400 acres of prime farmland out of service forever,” said Terri Treacy, Springfield representative of the Illinois chapter of the Sierra Club. “That land will never go back to farmland. It will be ruined forever. That really speaks to farmers.”

Treacy said that residents are worried about everything from dust and noise to an increase in truck traffic, especially since the mine is located near a school.

Officials from Sunrise say that the mine will be an economic boon to the region. In fall 2012 the company released an economic impact study of the mine produced by Northern Illinois University. It said the mine would provide 300 permanent jobs with an average salary of $76,000, and that the mine would generate $10.5 million in state and local taxes each year.

62 questions

Sunrise Coal filed its first permit application with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources in 2013, but the department ruled that the application did not include enough information for it to make a decision. Sunrise Coal submitted a revamped application in the fall of 2013, then the department responded with its list of 62 questions.

Rotche said that the long list of questions is evidence that that Bulldog Mine is far from a sure thing.

“Here we are six years after the first proposal and we still have all these questions unanswered,” Rotche said. “I can’t speak for Sunrise Coal, but some of these questions are significant. There are still questions on how the company is going to get coal off the site and water to it. Those are both practical questions that could prevent them from mining altogether. The fact that these questions remain unanswered is notable.”

The DNR also said that Sunrise’s plan to restore the land after mining operations are done is “vague and quite general.” The department asked Sunrise to provide a detailed timetable listing the anticipated completion dates for each major step in its plans to return the land to its former state once mining is done.

The DNR also noted that Sunrise does not clearly state whether it will use surface blasting to build intake and return air shafts during mine development, and asked for clarification.

The department also questioned the impact that the mine might have on water sources. It asked Sunrise to provide additional information on the presence or absence of natural springs in or adjacent to the proposed mine location.

Despite these questions, Treacy advises community residents not to get overconfident that their protests will keep Sunrise officials from opening the Bulldog Mine.

She said its possible Sunrise officials will decide to withdraw their permit application on their own – perhaps because of falling coal prices, or that residents’ concerns will result in changes that lessen the impact of the mine.

“We usually don’t see permits denied based on the concerns of the community members,” Treacy said. “If residents are concerned about dust, the Department of Natural Resources might tell the mining company to find a way to make less dust. It is tough to convince the department to deny most permits. But we do the best we can to make every permit as good as it can be. That is one thing that we hopefully can do.”

Dan Rafter is an Illinois-based freelance writer with more than 20 years of journalism experience. He’s covered environmental, technology and business stories for dozens of trade and consumer publications. He can be reached at danrafter@sbcglobal.net.

The Prairie Rivers Network and the Sierra Club are members of RE-AMP, which also publishes Midwest Energy News.

Related News

  • Report: Dominion Energy must start planning now for coal plant transition

    An analysis warns that market forces and policy changes put the underperforming Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center on a path to abrupt closure.

  • Virginia coalfield booster wants new renewable fund to send a message

    In an interview, an economic development director talks about his organization’s new $1 million fund to assist renewable energy projects.

  • Indiana task force report could slow state’s transition from coal, critics fear

    The final report from a Republican-led state task force cautions against shifting to renewables too quickly and contradicts a previous, more-detailed analysis.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You can change which regions you're subscribed to by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

Latest News

  • Proposals to prohibit natural gas bans may threaten cities’ clean energy goals
  • Connecticut regulators want to pay utility customers to sync storage with demand
  • ‘Clean Cars’ coalition wants Virginia lawmakers to address tailpipe emissions
  • Ann Arbor to lobby Michigan legislature for power to choose electricity sources
  • Cities, states would lose voice on model energy code updates under proposal
  • Connecticut plan lays out options for reaching zero-carbon power by 2040
  • Last chance for Illinois solar? Desperate advocates push fix in lame duck session
  • Solar synergy: How good timing and partnerships propelled a suburban D.C. county to its clean power goal

More from the Energy News Network

  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • About
  • Support

The Energy News Network is an editorially independent project of  
© Copyright 2021

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑