• Energy News Network
  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • Opinion
  • Newsletters
    • Daily email digests
    • Centered.tech
  • Books
  • About
    • Code of Ethics
    • Staff
  • Donate
FirstEnergy

AARP foreshadows opposition to Ohio nuclear subsidies

Written By John FunkApril 16, 2019
Photo By
Marc Haserodt / Creative Commons

Marc Haserodt / Creative Commons

The Davis-Besse nuclear plant.

The group hasn’t taken a formal position on a bill introduced Friday, but recently told lawmakers it would oppose “any legislation” to prop up nuclear plants

AARP Ohio informed top Republican lawmakers before they introduced a bill subsidizing old nuclear and certain coal power plants that the organization would aggressively fight to defeat such legislation.

In a letter sent to House Speaker Larry Householder, R-Glenford, a day before he unveiled House Bill 6 last week, AARP state director Barbara Sykes wrote that AARP would strongly oppose “any legislation” imposing a customer surcharge to subsidize the nuclear plants.

“AARP Ohio, on behalf of its 1.5 million members and families, strongly opposes any surcharge or tax on utility customers in our state that would serve to subsidize the for-profit nuclear power industry,” she wrote.

“That [new fees to subsidize a utility] is patently unfair — why should Ohio customers supplement the electricity bills for those living in other states,” her letter asked, referring to the rules requiring power plants in Ohio and 13 other states to send their output into the multi-state high-voltage grid managed by PJM Interconnection.

The strongly-worded opposition letter was not surprising, given that state AARP chapters routinely oppose utility rate increases. The Pennsylvania office of the AARP opposes a similar nuclear power plant subsidy bill in that state. FirstEnergy Solutions owns a two-reactor nuclear power plant near Pittsburgh with a total capacity of about 1,815 megawatts.

Sykes did not return a phone call request for comment Tuesday.

But Jason Smith, associate director of advocacy for the organization, said in a phone interview that AARP has not yet taken a position on House Bill 6 as it was introduced late Friday afternoon, a day after Sykes sent her letter to Householder.

Smith said the Sykes letter expressed “our general opposition to such subsidies” and that AARP would not take a position on the bill until it completes an analysis of its impact. 

GOP leaders have said the legislation would raise about $300 million per year from customers. While they maintain customer bills would initially be lower, clean energy advocates say the proposal will cost ratepayers more in the long run by defunding energy efficiency and clean energy measures.

An initial hearing on the legislation was held Tuesday before the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Another round of hearings begin Wednesday before the Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Generation.

Tuesday’s hearing began a day after lawyers for FirstEnergy Solutions asked a federal bankruptcy court in Akron for permission for an additional 90 days to file a plan of reorganization. The company sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Mar. 31. The court rejected the company’s first plan because it included reference to a deal absolving parent company FirstEnergy from any future liabilities for environmental problems caused by its power plants.

About John Funk

John Funk

John Funk is a Cleveland-based journalist who has written for the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Akron Beacon Journal, and Cincinnati Post.

  • More by John

Related News

  • FirstEnergy faces another audit as advocates and others press for broader investigations

    The order comes as newly released documents point to a larger role on legislative matters for the former utilities commission chair.

  • FirstEnergy statements could support broad scope for PUCO-ordered audit

    Evasive legal responses don’t say what happened after funds from ratepayers went into a money pool.

  • Latest challenge raises question of reopening FirstEnergy Solutions’ bankruptcy ruling

    Questions about the transparency of FirstEnergy, Energy Harbor and others are central to proceedings in multiple cases.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You can change which regions you're subscribed to by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

Latest News

  • Oil industry group poised to back carbon pricing
  • The gate outside the Massachusetts Statehouse, with the Capitol Building behind it.
    Massachusetts groups back expanded carbon tax with focus on equity
  • Bird's eye view of a landfill.
    Group reports milestone in tracking the benefits of renewable gas investments
  • A small wind turbine.
    As wind industry goes big, this New England startup looks to shrink turbines
  • Santa Monica deters gas vehicles by ‘pricing the curb’
  • Senate confirms Granholm to lead Energy Department
  • Illinois Capitol
    Illinois energy bill proposes ‘green bank’ as national movement builds
  • Looking up from underneath a transmission tower.
    Critics fear investors’ push for profits could thwart other FirstEnergy priorities

More from the Energy News Network

  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • About
  • Support

The Energy News Network is an editorially independent project of  
© Copyright 2021

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑