• Energy News Network
  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • Opinion
  • Newsletters
    • Daily email digests
    • Centered.tech
  • Books
  • About
    • Code of Ethics
    • Staff
  • Donate
Michigan

Developer cancels plan for large Upper Peninsula wind project

Written By Andy BalaskovitzApril 19, 2019
Photo By
RES

RES

The proposed location of the Summit Lake wind project in Michigan's Upper Peninsula.

Residents were divided over the 49-turbine project, which was awaiting the results of a local referendum scheduled for May 7.

Citing planning delays, a global renewable energy developer has canceled plans for a major wind project in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.

A local referendum on the project is scheduled for May 7, though it is not clear whether that impacted developers’ decision.  

The 130-megawatt Summit Lake Wind project, backed by global developer Renewable Energy Systems (RES), had divided local residents over its location in “pristine U.P. wilderness” near Lake Superior. The project in L’Anse Township northwest of Marquette was opposed by the local tribe for threatening hunting and fishing access.

“After a careful review of several factors, RES has decided to discontinue the development of the Summit Lake Wind project,” RES project manager Sean Stocker said in a statement. “We have enjoyed working with the local community and want to thank all the landowners and supporters of the Summit Lake Wind project.”

The company said “continued delays in the planning process have ceased to make the project financially and logistically viable.” A company spokesperson declined a request for further comment.

Researchers who previously spoke to Energy News Network described Summit Lake as unique because of its location (most Michigan wind projects are on rural farmland) and leasing structure with primarily one landowner. The project called for 49 turbines spread over thousands of acres near the McCormick Wilderness area of the Ottawa National Forest.

The company previously said the site was chosen due to the local wind availability, grid capacity, distance from residences and for its “compatible use of timberland.” RES was first exploring the site in 2016.

Some in the community supported the project for the potential tax revenue. A township referendum on a local zoning ordinance to effectively permit the project is on May 7. The ordinance would allow wind turbines on forest district land in the township. Opponents have been urging local residents to vote “no.”

Jeffery Loman, a member of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community as well as the local opposition group Friends of the Huron Mountains, said designated commercial forest land is not the right place for wind development.

“This is, of course, good news,” he said of RES’ announcement. However, Loman and others remained concerned about potential development in the township, or even RES potentially coming back.

“The referendum on May 7 is no less important today than it was yesterday,” he said.

About Andy Balaskovitz

Andy Balaskovitz

Andy has been a journalism fellow for Midwest Energy News since 2014, following four years at City Pulse, Lansing’s alt-weekly newspaper. He covers the state of Michigan and also compiles the Midwest Energy News daily email digest. Andy is a graduate of Michigan State University’s Journalism School, where he focused on topics covered by the Knight Center for Environmental Journalism and wrote for the Great Lakes Echo. He was the 2008 and 2009 recipient of the Edward Meeman Award for Outstanding Undergraduate Student in Environmental Journalism at Michigan State.

  • More by Andy

Related News

  • Michigan energy task force readies propane report, but questions loom

    The Upper Peninsula’s dependence on propane is a factor in the state’s debate over the future of the Line 5 natural gas pipeline.

  • Amid energy transition in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, what is solar’s role?

    Critics says the Upper Peninsula Power Co. is promoting its own large solar project while discouraging rooftop projects.

  • Cost, benefits still unknown for better transmission between Michigan peninsulas

    Previous cost estimates have not been updated since the state proposed a utility tunnel under the Straits of Mackinac.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You can change which regions you're subscribed to by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

Latest News

  • Online portal aims to be clearinghouse for community solar subscriptions
  • Michigan solar ruling could expand the role of residential energy storage
  • Proposals to prohibit natural gas bans may threaten cities’ clean energy goals
  • Connecticut regulators want to pay utility customers to sync storage with demand
  • ‘Clean Cars’ coalition wants Virginia lawmakers to address tailpipe emissions
  • Ann Arbor to lobby Michigan legislature for power to choose electricity sources
  • Cities, states would lose voice on model energy code updates under proposal
  • Connecticut plan lays out options for reaching zero-carbon power by 2040

More from the Energy News Network

  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • About
  • Support

The Energy News Network is an editorially independent project of  
© Copyright 2021

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑