• Energy News Network
  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • Opinion
  • Newsletters
    • Daily email digests
    • Centered.tech
  • Books
  • About
    • Code of Ethics
    • Staff
  • Donate
technology

Illinois will take more time to consider customer impact of cloud software

Written By David ThillJuly 16, 2019
Photo By
Elchinator / Creative Commons
source code software

Elchinator / Creative Commons

State regulators withdrew a proposed rule change for utilities that use third-party subscriptions rather than onsite software.

Illinois regulators have withdrawn for now a proposed rule change that would let utilities earn a rate of return for cloud-based software subscriptions.

The Illinois Commerce Commission faced an early July deadline to implement the rule. On June 26 it voted instead to retract and resubmit the proposal later to allow more time to address questions about how it could affect customers.

Supporters of the proposed rule said they’re still hopeful regulators will eventually adopt the change, which they think will help utilities keep pace with the technological changes needed to manage an increasingly complex electric system.

Cloud-based software is usually provided as a subscription service from an outside developer. Since the software comes from a third party, it is often more easily updated and can save utilities time and money compared to onsite software.

However, traditional accounting rules usually require utilities to count cloud-based software as an operating expense. This means they can’t earn a rate of return on the investment like they can with traditional software, which they can invest in as a capital expense. The rule proposed in Illinois would have allowed ComEd and Ameren, along with the state’s other regulated utilities, to account for cloud software like they would onsite software, giving them the opportunity to earn money from investments.

The Illinois General Assembly’s Joint Committee on Administrative Rules in June raised an objection to the proposal, requesting more information from the commission on how it could affect customers. But by state law, the rule, introduced in 2018, would have had to go into effect by early July of this year. Given the tight deadline, the commission voted on June 26 to withdraw the proposal and resubmit the rule later to allow time to address the committee’s objection.

The joint committee “recommended that the [Illinois Commerce Commission] resubmit the rule after some additional review. We’re hopeful that ICC will do so,” Danny Waggoner, a director at Advanced Energy Economy, an energy industry association, wrote in an email.

Illinois’ clean energy goals will require utilities to process huge data sets from renewables, storage and efficiency programs, he said. “This task can far more efficiently and effectively be accomplished through leveraging the scale and cost of cloud computing rather than utilities investing in their own vast data centers and developing the internal expertise to provide these functions.”

Read more: As software technology advances, utilities may have to figure out how to do the same

Ultimately the final rule will need to balance the benefits and costs of software investments so that utilities can choose whichever solution, cloud-based or onsite, is best to serve customers, said David Kolata, executive director of the Citizens Utility Board.

“We thought that the rule was in the realm of reason,” Kolata said. “But it’s certainly the kind of thing to get right.” 

Cloud computing will be increasingly important for managing distributed energy resources, he said. This issue won’t go away, so the commission isn’t bound to a specific deadline, but, he said, “I think it would behoove the state to lay out the ground rules sooner rather than later.”

The Illinois attorney general’s office objected to the rule throughout the discussion process, arguing that there’s no clear disadvantage for cloud software in current accounting rules. “We support the effort by utility companies to use cost-effective, modern cloud computing options, and we do not think that the ICC’s decision to withdraw the proposed rule will slow the adoption of these technologies,” Tori Joseph, a spokesperson for the attorney general’s office, wrote in an email. “Companies are already using cloud computing options and will continue to do so because they are more effective and economical than other options.”

Both of Illinois’ regulated electric utilities supported the rule. A ComEd spokesperson wrote in a statement that the proposed rules for cloud computing will be key to the company’s continuing innovation.

“It’s important that the Commission takes the time needed to solicit and fully consider stakeholder input on this matter,” the spokesperson said. “We look forward to seeing the rulemaking reinitiated.”

Related coverage:
» Alexa, help me save energy: Utilities have opportunity with smart gadgets
» Illinois smart meter data illustrates demographic divides in electricity use
» Smart grid transformation hinges on data bandwidth — and lots of it
» Report: Utilities missing opportunities to tailor efficiency pitches to customers

About David Thill

David Thill

David is a New York-based journalist who has written on health, science and the environment for various outlets, including World Wildlife Fund and the Chicago newspaper Windy City Times. He has reported on topics including the city’s opioid epidemic, bird research at the Field Museum, and LGBT youth in foster care. He covers northern New England for the Energy News Network.

  • More by David

Related News

  • Nissan Leaf charging

    Smart pricing could help make sure electric vehicles don’t overwhelm grid

    Stakeholders told Illinois regulators that programs encouraging off-peak charging benefit all customers.

  • The need for charging stations is clear, but who should own them is not

    Stakeholders tell Illinois regulators that different locations will require different ownership and incentives.

  • Court blocks release of Illinois electric grid study until lawsuit is resolved

    NextGrid could determine the future of the state’s grid policy, but the study’s own future now depends on an open lawsuit.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You can change which regions you're subscribed to by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

Latest News

  • Proposals to prohibit natural gas bans may threaten cities’ clean energy goals
  • Connecticut regulators want to pay utility customers to sync storage with demand
  • ‘Clean Cars’ coalition wants Virginia lawmakers to address tailpipe emissions
  • Ann Arbor to lobby Michigan legislature for power to choose electricity sources
  • Cities, states would lose voice on model energy code updates under proposal
  • Connecticut plan lays out options for reaching zero-carbon power by 2040
  • Last chance for Illinois solar? Desperate advocates push fix in lame duck session
  • Solar synergy: How good timing and partnerships propelled a suburban D.C. county to its clean power goal

More from the Energy News Network

  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • About
  • Support

The Energy News Network is an editorially independent project of  
© Copyright 2021

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑