Downtown Minneapolis. Credit: Groveland Media / Flickr / Creative Commons

Stay connected!

Our FREE newsletters provide a daily roundup of the morning’s top headlines. Subscribe today!






A recent report analyzed links between emissions, poverty and housing stock in dozens of cities, including Minneapolis.

Getting people out of poverty, as well as older, inefficient homes, helped Minneapolis lower its per capita greenhouse gas emissions last decade.

That’s according to a recent report by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, which looked at the links between emissions, poverty, and housing stock in several cities across the country.

Construction of new and efficient housing and a reduction of residents living in poverty from 2013 to 2017 helped reduce per capita annual electricity use by 1% and natural gas by 4% in cities studied in the report. The study included dozens of municipalities while focusing on results from Minneapolis, Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles.

Residential and commercial buildings represent 40% of greenhouse gas emissions, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. A blueprint for what works to decrease greenhouse gases from residential building use was one of the priorities of the ACEEE report.

The researchers found greenhouse gas emissions dropped 59% in Minneapolis, compared to 32% in Los Angeles and 26% in Washington, D.C. The data ties higher per capita energy consumption to older homes, many of which have not seen energy efficiency investments. Gentrification helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions, too, as wealthier people move into low-income neighborhoods and retrofit homes. But gentrification was less an issue in Minneapolis than the other two cities.

Newer housing played a crucial role in the decline of greenhouse gases. “Newer homes built to more efficient standards require less maintenance and operate more efficiently,” said Stefen Samarripas, one of the report’s authors.

Equity advocates have argued for years that low-income households pay a higher energy burden than others, often due in part to their older, less efficient homes. The report suggests that city leaders consider the age of their housing stock when making investments, he said.

In Minneapolis, the trend toward newer housing led to a drop in emissions, Samarripas said. The city’s share of households living in homes built before 1950 declined by 5.4%. Residents living in housing built after 2010 grew 4.8%. “More folks were moving into newer homes than folks moving into older homes,” he said.

The report looks at whether the trend results from wealthier people moving into cities and displacing poorer residents. Washington, D.C., had the most acute gentrification, with more than a third of residents living in areas where lower-income households once resided.

Minneapolis fared better than either of the other two cities. Only 6% of the city’s residents live in gentrifying neighborhoods. Yet the share of low-income families declined. Gentrification, however, may not have been the cause of the decline in low-income families, the research found.

Instead, the report said Minneapolis enjoys greater intergenerational mobility, with more residents in their 30s having escaped childhood poverty by climbing into the middle class.

“In Minneapolis, if you’re in your mid-30s today but grew up in a low-income family, you are doing better financially than you would be if you lived in D.C. or L.A.,” Samarripas said. “That’s one possible explanation for why the share of households in poverty has declined in Minneapolis, and that may be why there are reductions in electricity use the city has seen in recent years.”

As residents age out of poverty, they move to newer homes or have enough disposable income to pay for energy-efficient investments, Samarripas said. Creating more economic opportunities for low-income residents leads to a more equitable approach to reducing energy consumption than gentrification, he said.

Still, families that remain in poverty continue to face challenges. Researchers found they have moved to larger homes and increased their energy burden, Samarripas said. Many of these homes could be rental properties bought up during the Great Recession, he said.

Ben Passer, director of energy access and equity for Fresh Energy, a St. Paul clean energy advocacy group that also publishes the Energy News Network, said the report highlighted the decisive role new affordable housing serves in underserved communities by decreasing the energy bills of low-income families while reducing pollution. The reason Minneapolis saw less gentrification could be because of several city-sponsored energy efficiency programs that help businesses and households pay for projects, he said.

The city established “green zones” last year to connect residents and building owners to efficiency programs while maintaining affordable housing. Tax incentive programs encourage building owners to keep affordable rents and add energy efficiency improvements, he said.    

“Minneapolis has taken a really close look at this intersection between stability and energy affordability and what can be done at the local level to ensure those households aren’t being displaced,” Passer said.

He would like to see the city encourage more new construction of affordable, efficient housing that would be heated and cooled with renewable energy. “As cities undertake decisions around housing and planning, they should be considering energy affordability and stability in communities,” he said.

Minneapolis city officials declined to comment on the report’s findings.

Studying per capita energy use allowed the researchers to compare cities more easily than greenhouse gas inventories, Samarripas said. More consistent data will help cities track their progress and compare themselves to their peers. For now, he hopes the report creates policies to reduce the energy burden of low-income residents in the future.


Samarripas and co-author Caetano de Campos Lopes of the Community Climate Collaborative offer the following recommendations to cities seeking to reduce greenhouse gases:

  • Increase the pace of new construction, allow for more density, and shorten the approval time for projects.
  • Pass a stricter energy code, if possible, and enforce it. Offer incentives for developers who meet green code standards.
  • Target incentives to help low-income households access energy efficient affordable housing. Programs can be focused on buildings or neighborhoods, or create a comprehensive approach.

Fresh Energy staff, board members and funders do not have access to or oversight of the Energy News Network’s editorial process. More about our relationship with Fresh Energy can be found in our code of ethics.

Frank Jossi

Frank is an independent journalist and consultant based in St. Paul and a longtime contributor to Midwest Energy News. His articles have appeared in more than 50 publications, including Minnesota Monthly, Wired, the Los Angeles Times, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Minnesota Technology, Finance & Commerce and others. Frank has also been a Humphrey policy fellow at the University of Minnesota, a Fulbright journalism teacher in Pakistan and Albania, and a program director of the World Press Institute at Macalester College.