House Bill 260’s requirement for regular ratemaking cases is a reform many have wanted for years. But critics say the bill’s limits on transparency and stakeholder participation are the wrong way to go in the wake of House Bill 6.
Thank you for registering!
An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.
Every morning, thousands of energy professionals turn to our newsletters for the day’s most important news. Sign up for free to get the latest delivered straight to your inbox.
The Energy News Network is powered by support from readers like you. Your contribution will help support vital reporting on regional energy issues that helps to both inform and watchdog important public policy discussions.
House Bill 260’s requirement for regular ratemaking cases is a reform many have wanted for years. But critics say the bill’s limits on transparency and stakeholder participation are the wrong way to go in the wake of House Bill 6.