• Energy News Network
  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • Opinion
  • Newsletters
    • Daily email digests
    • Centered.tech
  • Books
  • About
    • Code of Ethics
    • Staff
  • Donate
PJM

7 takeaways on how grid operator PJM weathered the polar vortex

Written By Kathiann M. KowalskiFebruary 1, 2019
Photo By
PJM Interconnection

PJM Interconnection

Inside the PJM control room.

Performance throughout the regional grid territory was good, thanks in large part to planning.

As temperatures plunged, demand for electricity surged. On Thursday, peak morning demand for PJM ranked within the grid operator’s top 10 winter peaks for the last five years as utility customers in the region tried to stay warm.

PJM Interconnection

PJM Vice President for Operations Michael Bryson.

The electric grid held up, though, staying reliable through the bone-chilling blast of a polar vortex that brought record low temperatures to the region. Michael Bryson, PJM’s vice president for operations, credits preparations by PJM and generators for the lack of disruptions on its system, which covers all or parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia.

“We certainly were prepared short-term going into the cold weather,” Bryson said. “A lot of the prep that we’ve done over the past couple of years … has generation owners and operators more prepared.”

Here are seven takeaways on how the grid operator weathered the polar vortex.

Business closures helped moderate peak demand.

PJM Interconnection

A screen shot shows real-time generation statistics as displayed on the PJM Interconnection website on Thursday afternoon.

Various large manufacturing plants and businesses closed down, in addition to most schools. So, peak demand was more like that for a weekend than a weekday — under 140,000 megawatts Thursday instead of 143,000, as forecast.

The system basically performed as expected.

In November, a PJM study on “fuel security” revealed no peak winter reliability problem for at least five years, “even in an extreme scenario.”

That report was controversial because some groups have been pressing for subsidies for so-called “fuel-secure” coal and nuclear generation in PJM’s region. The PJM report speculated that additional clusters of conditions might lead to additional “extreme but plausible” scenarios. However, there were no calculations of the chances that any of those more speculative clusters of circumstances might actually happen. Nor did the report consider how new electricity resources entering the market would change any such risks.

Changes made after the 2014 polar vortex helped, too.

Rules put in place after a 2014 polar vortex used a carrot-and-stick approach to make sure generators would be available next time. “You can see that units have made investments in different areas to be better ready,” Bryson said.

The carrot was additional payments in the capacity market so generation resources could invest in winter weather preparations. The stick was heavy financial penalties if a power plant that cleared the auction wasn’t ready and able to supply power when needed.

Generators were prepared for extreme cold.

Cold weather alerts issued one to seven days before very cold temperatures alert generation and transmission operators to restore any maintenance outages and defer other routine maintenance.

Generation plants also take steps right before the cold weather hits. So, for example, gas generation plants or other plants that depend heavily on water may use heat wrap and take other steps to make sure bitter cold doesn’t interfere with their supply. Other polar vortex events have also shown the importance of making sure cold air doesn’t penetrate the power plant. “You literally do that at the last minute,” Bryson said.

Coal and gas plants did not have fuel problems.

The PJM region hasn’t had large-scale coal pile freezes in the last couple of years, Bryson said. If chunks going into a pulverizer have a lot of ice, though, the quality of the fuel can go down.

“When you get temperatures like this, there is a significant amount of home heating and industrial heating that comes from natural gas. There tends to be a competition there.” But those issues didn’t present any problems for PJM’s territory in January. “Natural gas availability so far has been very good.”

Solar and wind generation kept performing.

PJM Interconnection

A screen shot shows real-time solar and wind generation statistics as displayed on the PJM Interconnection website on Thursday afternoon.

Wind and solar energy make up a very small share of the total generation mix in the PJM footprint. Yet both continued to produce electricity. On Jan. 31, wind generation was highest in the early morning hours after midnight, while solar energy production picked up after dawn and grew as noon approached.

Prices did not skyrocket out of control.

“If there are units that thought they would incur costs above the $1,000-per-megawatt cap, [then] they had to get them precleared ahead of time,” Bryson said. “I don’t think we had any of those requests. But we had procedures in place to be able to handle and review them.” Nor did PJM see unusually high fuel prices for Jan. 30 and 31, he added.

About Kathiann M. Kowalski

Kathiann M. Kowalski

Kathi is the author of 25 books and more than 600 articles, and writes often on science and policy issues. In addition to her journalism career, Kathi is an alumna of Harvard Law School and has spent 15 years practicing law. She is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists and the National Association of Science Writers. Kathi covers the state of Ohio.

  • More by Kathiann M.

Related News

  • a trio of wind turbines

    Challenged federal rule could price many renewables out of PJM’s capacity market

    Sweeping “minimum offer” rule will likely cut into the competitive edge for renewables as a hedge against fossil fuels.

  • a sign above a bank of windows: "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission"

    FERC’s ‘minimum offer’ rule adds to the already high price tag for Ohio HB 6

    Nuclear and coal subsidies mean state consumers will likely pay more than $1 billion per year more, an analysis shows.

  • With new study, critics push back on PJM’s proposed 10-hour storage rule

    Industry groups argue that even batteries that don’t meet the 10-hour threshold still provide the same reliability benefits as fossil fuel power plants.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

You can change which regions you're subscribed to by clicking the link in the footer of our emails.

Latest News

  • Inside the Ohio Senate chamber from above.
    Ohio Republicans’ bill would force state agencies to reduce their rule books
  • An aerial view of downtown Lima, Ohio.
    Ohio refinery city joins coalition to support local clean energy transitions
  • A sign: "Town of Kennebunkport, Incorporated 1653."
    Bonus rebate aims to entice Maine small towns to make the switch to heat pumps
  • Lake Superior reflects lighted skyline along the Duluth, Minnesota, lakefront.
    Duluth looks to cut emissions through sharing more efficient building heat
  • Lawrence Brothers laser
    This Virginia coal-mining equipment supplier sees a future in clean energy
  • Indiana Capitol Building
    Indiana lawmakers advance coal plant securitization, renewable siting bills
  • A calculator rests on top of a messy pile of U.S. bills.
    Commentary: Why we intervened in Kentucky Power’s 3rd rate hike in 5 years
  • An aerial view of the Boston University campus on the Charles River
    To maximize emission cuts, this Boston campus gets its power from the Midwest

More from the Energy News Network

  • Energy News Network
  • Midwest
  • Southeast
  • Northeast
  • West
  • About
  • Support

The Energy News Network is an editorially independent project of  
© Copyright 2021

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑